The proposal title suggests a systematic review and meta-analysis but then states that “Our project is part of a master thesis for a M.Sc. in Psychology ”
“In the systematic review, data will be analyzed qualitatively. In the meta-analysis, odds-ratios will be calculated for the different adverse effects occurring under Topiramate vs. Placebo // Topiramate vs. active comprator using RevMan 5.”
The wording here suggests that this will be a very basic exercise to form part of a MSc project, rather than a substantive scientific project.
No analytics are described which would justify the release of IPD or CSRs.
It is not even clear that the applicant(s) could carry out a useful quantitative analysis of the published data.
Unfortunately I think the applicant has misunderstood the criteria we use. The kind of proposal described is worthwhile but would need to involve a team and many months of skilled analytic work.Not Approve